Association of Educational Sales
Representatives of New York State

Blog

The official blog of AESNYS, the Association of Educational Sales Reps of New York State.  Postings will cover educational issues both within New York State as well as national issues.  As our members are publisher and supplier reps we will also make postings regarding sales related issues.  Enjoy and participate!  Click here to subscribe to this blog's postings.
<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   Next >  Last >> 
  • 18 May 2012 8:56 AM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    RIP EMPSON, Techcrunch.com

    Two years ago, WhiteyBoard founders Saachi Cywinski, Sherwin Kim and Jason Wilk set out to re-think those clunky, inflexible whiteboardsfound in classrooms and offices around the country. They developed a portable, flexible alternative: An inexpensive, “instant” plastic board that weighs less than two pounds and adheres to any surface without screws.

    The idea, and the fact that co-founder Jason Wilk was (at the time) hard at work on a Y Combinator backed startup, quickly attracted $500K in seed funding from serial entrepreneur and founder of popular European professional network Xing.com, Bill Liao. The startup used the funding not only to to continue developing their whiteboards, but to develop a new product, called WhiteyPaint, which they launched late last year.

    Wilk tells us that WhiteyPaint has since found an eager audience, leading to the fortunate problem of demand quickly outpacing supply. Struggling to finance demand on a bootstrapped budget, the founders reached out to Dallas Mavericks owner, Shark Tank investor, and HDNet Co-founder Mark Cuban. Seeing a billion-dollar market dominated by a few bloated players, Wilk said, Cuban believed WhiteyBoard was onto something.

    So, today, the startup is officially announcing that it has raised an undisclosed round of seed financing from the billionaire entrepreneur. Wilk tells us that WhiteyBoard has already sold to over 10K businesses, and smaller versions of the product are currently in stores at retailers like Urban Outfitters and ThinkGeek as well as at fulfillment centers around the world. (What’s more, its products are now made exclusively in the U.S. of A.)

    Since last November, he says, sales for both its whiteboard and paint have quadrupled, and with the new funding from Cuban, the team is this week launching version 2 of its WhiteyBoard paint, which the founders say not only has better performance and more durability, but is “the best dry-erase product the world has ever seen.

    That remains to be seen, but it certainly helps in the validation department to have Cuban on your side. For now, WhitePaint is for sale on the startup’s website here.


    Company:Whiteyboard
    Website:whiteyboard.com
    Funding:$500k

    Whiteyboard has come up with an ultra inexpensive white board that sticks on to any wall, weighs less than 2 pounds and gets you working in seconds.

    LEARN MORE
    Tags: 
    Original Posting
  • 16 May 2012 3:07 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    FOR RELEASE:  May 16, 2012

    CONTACT: David Albert , NYSSBA
    (518) 783-3716 or (518) 320-2221 cell
    On Twitter: @nyschoolboards


    Overall, 96% of school budgets pass

    New York State voters approved 96.4 percent of school district budgets on Tuesday, May 15, according to an analysis by the New York State School Boards Association.


    “Today’s results are a ringing endorsement by voters of their public schools and place an exclamation point on the fact that local school governance works,” said NYSSBA Executive Director Timothy G. Kremer. 


    Initial statewide results gathered by NYSSBA indicate voters have passed 651 of 675 school district budgets.  The number of budgets defeated was 24.


    This is the first year school districts have had to contend with a property tax cap. Six hundred twenty-three districts, or 92.8 percent, were at or below their maximum allowable tax levy increases under the cap, and required a simple majority to pass their budgets.  Of those districts, 99.2 percent passed.


    Forty-eight districts, or 7.2 percent, had budgets that exceeded the tax cap and required a 60 percent “supermajority” to pass.  Of those districts, 60.4 percent passed their budgets. 


    Last year, taxpayers approved 93 percent of school district budgets. The average passage rate since 1969 is 84 percent.  The average passage rate for the last five years leading up to this year’s vote is 94 percent.


    “The voting public has once again shown its strong support for education.  Voters recognized that school leaders did everything they could to comply with the spirit and intent of the property tax levy cap,” said Kremer. “They were responsive to their communities.”


    “But keeping within the tax cap required sacrifices,” he said, adding that 99 percent of districts needed to use reserve funds to make ends meet.  A majority of districts also cut teaching and non-teaching positions as well as programs and services.


    The average statewide tax levy increase of 2.3 percent for 2012-13 is more than a full percentage point below the average of 3.4 percent in 2011-12. 


    The average proposed spending increase for the 2012-13 school year is 1.5 percent, compared to 1.3 percent in 2011-12, 1.4 percent in 2010-11, 2.3 percent in 2009-10, 5.3 percent in 2008-09, and 6.1 percent in 2007-08.


    Kremer cautioned that with dwindling reserve funds, districts are going to need significant mandate relief from the state. While linking state aid to personal income growth sounds reasonable, he said, “we have to recognize that the cost of doing business in New York is simply higher than other states and that has repercussions for school districts.  Moreover, outdated state laws such as the Triborough Amendment make it difficult for school districts to get long-term concessions.”


    In school districts where the budget failed to pass, a second vote may be held on June 19.  School boards may forgo a second vote and adopt a contingency budget.  Under state law, a contingency budget requires zero percent growth in the district’s tax levy.


    On Tuesday, voters also filled vacancies on their local school boards and voted on separate propositions to fund such needs as school construction or bus purchases.


    “Congratulations to all of the newly elected school board members,” said Kremer. “Serving on a school board is one of the most significant and honorable ways to contribute in a local community.”


  • 16 May 2012 2:52 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    May 11, 2012 | Leave a comment

    The New York State Education Department in partnership with the College Board is pleased to announce a three-year program focused on Professional Development for Advanced Coursework in STEM. We invite you to join this initiative as we lead the nation with the first state-wide STEM Advanced Professional Development Program in the United States.

    The program commences this summer with 5-day Summer Institutes in Math and Science which will focus on aligned curriculum through vertical teaming. Additional training opportunities will be ongoing with blended face-to-face and online professional development through August 2014.

    Both new and experienced math and science educators from eligible schools will learn effective strategies for building a pipeline of rigorous, aligned instruction

    All the workshops are FREE, and participation will enhance teachers’ knowledge, skills, and ability to prepare your students for college and careers.

    The application due date is June 15, 2012.

    Apply Here

  • 08 May 2012 1:22 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    Site URL: ScienceNewsForKids.org


    Content:  Science News for Kids is a frequently updated news site featuring science-related topics including food, nutrition, the body, health and our ancestors. The articles are accompanied by large, clear photographs and vocabulary words. Some also include activities such as word searches.


    Design:  This site has a bold, streamlined design, eye-catching photos and an easy-to-read sans serif fontundefinedresulting in a sophisticated look and feel. A magazine-style layout and top navigation bar make it easy to navigate.


    News for kidsReview: Science News for Kids has a lot to offer as an effective news site designed for younger readers. The content is interesting and engaging for visitors of any age. But it also supports younger usersundefinedwithout pandering to themundefinedby including vocabulary words and definitions.


    Bottom Line:  This is a great Web site that educators can use to supplement science or current-events lessons. And its sophisticated feel will resonate with tweens and teens who want to feel a little more grown-up.

     

    Article by Sarah W. Caron, EducationWorld Social Media Editor
    Education World®                      
    Copyright © 2012 Education World

     

  • 08 May 2012 1:20 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    Site URL: LegoEducation.com

    Content:  Lego Education combines the unique excitement of Lego bricks with hands-on classroom solutions for science, technology, engineering, math, literacy and more.

    Design:  This site from Lego does away with all of the flash and pop of its product sites and sticks to business. (Don’t come in expecting fancy animations and fighting ninjas.) There is a clean and logical navigation that runs across the top and left sides of the site. Teachers can easily jump from one area to another without getting lost. In the off chance that users can’t find their way through the site, a hand search appears in the upper right corner of every page .

    LEgo EducationReview: Lego has earned a reputation for offering an incredibly fun toy and helping teach critical educational concepts to children. It should come as no surprise that the company’s educational materials are very good. They are all based in the STEM disciplines of science and math and come ready for classroom use. The only reason the site loses points is that everything has a price tag. The product line is very diverse, ranging from $5 books on fractions to $3,000 sets that provide enough materials for 24 students to explore pulleys, levers and much more.

    Bottom Line:  Lego Education’s materials and professional development content are very good--just be prepared to make an investment.

     

    Article by Jason Tomaszewski, EducationWorld Social Media Editor
    Education World®                      
    Copyright © 2012 Education World


  • 04 May 2012 4:39 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    U.S. Department of Education


    Contact:  
     Press Office, (202) 401-1576, press@ed.gov 


    The state-led effort to design new assessments aligned with college and career-ready standards moves into year two with an ambitious agenda that includes releasing sample questions and piloting the new assessments in select schools in the spring of 2013. The new assessments are being developed by two consortia made of 45 states and the District of Columbia with approximately $350 million in federal Race to the Top funds.

    U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said that the new assessments will be, “an absolute game changer in public education, but we need to get it right. We need input from teachers and the public and we need to make sure that the tests provide parents and teachers with the information they need to focus and personalize instruction for all children.”

    Reports released today by the U.S. Department of Education outline year-one activity by the two consortia – the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced). The effort to develop assessments across states at this scale is unprecedented and presented considerable challenges for each consortia in year one.

    PARCC’s first-year work included strong contributions from higher education partners to help define college- and career-ready standards. PARCC also brought together state and district leaders to collaborate on transitioning to the new standards and assessment system.

    “In just over a year, the 24 states in PARCC have made tremendous progress toward developing an innovative assessment system to make sure students are on a pathway to college and career readiness,” said Massachusetts Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Mitchell Chester, who chairs the PARCC Governing Board. “Drawing on the leadership from the states in our consortium, the PARCC assessment promises to be a tool to improve student achievement, returning information quickly to drive instruction and delivering useful information to parents, while also providing data on the effectiveness of our education systems.”

    In the first year, the Smarter Balanced consortium focused on helping states and districts understand new content standards and integrating technology into its assessment system.

    “Smarter Balanced is working with our member states to create a balanced assessment system that gives parents, teachers and students information and tools to improve teaching and learning,” said Executive Director of the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium Joe Willhoft, Ph.D. “Assessments that are aligned to college- and career-ready standards are critical to preparing all students for success in the global economy.”

    Once the new assessment systems are completed, participating states will use them in place of existing statewide assessments. Non-participating states are free to use them as well. Currently, they are on track for implementation in the 2014-15 school year.


  • 03 May 2012 3:37 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Kindergartners won’t be waiting until the first grade to learn about shapes. Classwork on comparative and superlative adjectives will begin in the third grade instead of the seventh grade. And as soon as students hit the sixth grade, they’ll start learning about negative numbers, a grade earlier than in school years past.

    Teacher Brian Butera undefined with Whitewater Middle students Lynsea Long (from left), Brianna Campbell and Angel Criswell undefined says he has high hopes for the Common Core, which replaces the Georgia Performance Standards.
    Brant Sanderlin, bsanderlin@ajc.comTeacher Brian Butera undefined with Whitewater Middle students Lynsea Long (from left), Brianna Campbell and Angel Criswell undefined says he has high hopes for the Common Core, which replaces the Georgia Performance Standards.

    Those are just a few of the sweeping changes in math, English and language arts that will be rolled out in Georgia schools this coming school year as 47 states adopt a common core of academic standards.

    “We all have the goal of the nation getting stronger, and it’s been state by state by state,” said Martha Reichrath, deputy superintendent of the Georgia Department of Education.

    The standards are designed to provide teachers and parents with a common understanding of what students are expected to learn at each grade level. The objective is to make sure students graduate high school prepared to succeed in a global economy and society.

    Educators appear to be on board with the changes, though some worry about too much upheaval.

    “Just as educators across the state were finally getting on board with and up to speed on the [Georgia Performance Standards], Common Core comes along to pose new challenges,” said Tim Callahan, spokesman for the Professional Association of Georgia Educators, the state’s largest teachers association.

    Parents also are still smarting from the last big change, a move to teaching three math concepts in a single course that had thousands of high school students struggling and tutoring services booming. Some school districts still have integrated math, but because of a public outcry, they were given the option to drop it.

    Now, districts are working to learn more about the new standards and hoping they will bring the desired results.

    “I have a community that’s just edgy,” Fulton County Superintendent Robert Avossa said. “They are nervous. Are we going to get it right? Is the state and this Common Core really going to do what they say?”

    Through Webinars and other training exercises, teachers across the state are prepping for the changes, which infuse reading and writing into almost every subject, including science, where many Georgia students have struggled.

    Improving literacy across subject areas undefined helping, for example, a student to understand a scientific term so he or she could complete an assignment undefined should improve performance in those areas, state education officials say.

    Common Core curriculum changes are coming for science and, later, for social studies, but those changes are years away. A new national test to measure student performance, which in Georgia would replace the Criterion-Referenced Competency Test, could be offered as soon as the 2014-15 school year.

    Georgia was one of the first states to adopt the new standards in English, language arts and math. Indeed, the new standards have a close Georgia connection: In June 2010, they were rolled out to the nation at Peachtree Ridge High School in Suwanee as a nod to the influence of then-Gov. Sonny Perdue, a key, early proponent.

    Schools in Georgia have a head start over those in other states in embracing the new, national standards because changes here had already begun to increase the rigor of some coursework.

    Brian Butera, a seventh-grade math teacher in Fayette County, said he has high hopes for the Common Core, which replaces the current Georgia Performance Standards and was developed by experts across the country, not just in Georgia.

    “So, the best minds worked on getting this right,” said Butera, an 11-year teaching veteran. “I think they help strengthen what was already in place with the GPS. Our students are beginning to think critically and communicate mathematically.”

    Georgia is receiving $400 million in federal Race to the Top grant funding, some of which has been used to help the state’s Department of Education prepare for the national standards.

    States that wanted Race to the Top funding were pushed to adopt the national standards. Georgia Department of Education officials said they don’t feel the state has been strong-armed into adopting the new standards.

    “What you hope happens is you can share best practices with other states,” said Mike Buck, chief academic officer at the Georgia Department of Education. “It’s not just to say, ‘We’re No. 1.’ It’s to help all boys and girls.”

    In addition to sharing tips on what works, Buck said Georgia districts could see some savings through reduced textbook costs. With schools across the country teaching similar material, the hope, Buck said, is that they could band together, buy in bulk and drive costs down.

    Two dozen staff members at the state Department of Education, who earn a combined $1.3 million per year, are helping to implement the new standards. The department expects to hire three more. The staff members are paid with money from the Race to the Top grant and from department funds.

    In addition to Race to the Top money, districts are already spending thousands on training, as well as substitute teachers.

    In Cobb County, for example, the school system has incurred some expense by bringing in national presenters who train large groups of teachers, said Jay Dillon, communications director for Cobb County Schools, the second-largest school system in the state.

    “These sessions may run $3,000 for the trainer and $8,000-$30,000 for subs. We have held multiple sessions of this nature throughout the year,” he said.

    In large districts, getting teachers the training they need hasn’t been easy.

    “In a district that has 114 schools and 15,000 staff members, getting the highest quality training to all teachers is an enormous task,” Dillon said. “The needs of our schools are very diverse, and providing training that meets their individual and collective needs poses a unique challenge.”

    Teacher training has been ongoing in Gwinnett County, the state’s largest school district, all year and will continue over the summer, said Mary Elizabeth Davis, the system’s curriculum director.

    Avossa said it’s not been easy in Fulton County, either.

    “It’s a lot of changes, a lot for a district of our size to handle,” he said. “I have a communication struggle on my hands right now making sure people understand what’s happening.”

    Still, most educators see this as necessary if students in the state and nation are to be competitive globally.

    “We are excited about the possibility of moving education in the right direction,” said Calvine Rollins, president of the Georgia Association of Educators, “so we are definitely on board.”

    COMMON CORE BASICS

    • Common Core is a new set of national academic standards designed to give students knowledge and skills needed to succeed in college or in the work force.
    • The standards are to improve reading, literacy and critical thinking, and they are, eventually, to lead to a national assessment in which student performance can be reliably compared from state to state.
    • Georgia agreed to adopt the Common Core in 2010, with classroom implementation beginning this fall in English/language arts and math. New standards for science and social studies are expected to be introduced in two to three years.

    EXAMPLES OF COMMON CORE CHANGES

    The new Common Core standards will lead to curriculum changes in Georgia schools this fall. Some examples:

    In math:

    • Shapes introduced in kindergarten, not the first grade.
    • Factoring, prime numbers, composites and adding, subtracting and multiplying fractions introduced in the fourth grade, not the fifth grade.
    • Negative numbers introduced in the sixth grade, not the seventh grade.
    • Solving inequalities and basic probability introduced in the seventh grade, not the eighth grade.
    • Calculating the mean absolute deviation introduced in the sixth grade, not the ninth grade.
    • Determining the volume of a sphere introduced in the eighth grade, not the 10th grade.
    • Use of the Pythagorean theorem to find distances introduced in the eighth grade, not the ninth grade.

    In English/language arts:

    • The function of adverbs introduced in the third grade, not the fourth grade.
    • Abstract nouns introduced in the third grade, not the sixth grade.
    • Specific verb tenses introduced in the third grade, not the fifth grade.
    • Pronoun-antecedent agreement introduced in the third grade, not the seventh grade.
    • Comparative and superlative adjectives introduced in the third grade, not the seventh grade.
  • 03 May 2012 3:34 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    U.S. Department of Education


    Contact:  
     Press Office, (202) 401-1576, press@ed.gov 



    The U.S. Department of Education today announced the award of nearly $24.4 million for 73 grants to improve instruction for English learners. Located in 28 states and the District of Columbia, the grants support a variety of professional development activities for teachers and other educational personnel who work in in elementary and secondary school classrooms with English learners.

    Grants are awarded to institutions of higher education that partner with one or more local school districts or state education agencies. All grants are for five years in duration with the exception of the grant to Columbia University's Teachers' College, which is a three-year grant. The majority of these grants include professional development for science and math teachers of English learners.

    "These funds will help upgrade the content and instructional skills of new and veteran teachers working with English learners, as well provide career ladder programs for paraprofessionals," said Rosalinda B. Barrera, assistant deputy secretary and Director of the Office of English Language Acquisition. "It's critical for our English learners to have access to high-quality instruction in all subjects that will prepare them for success in college, the workplace and our global economy."

    Following is a list of the 2012 National Professional Development grantees, by state, with contact names and addresses for more information about individual projects.

  • 02 May 2012 5:56 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    Original article by TechCrunch Social

    Regardless of Android or the fact that 96 percent of its revenues come from advertising, from the beginning Google’s mission statement has been “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” Google’s mission changed the Web, and it remains true that, if you know what you’re looking for, there isn’t a more useful search tool. But if you don’t, that’s not always true. Take education, which sees 3.7 billion searches every month. Generally speaking, education-related decisions undefined like what school to go to, what to study undefined aren’t made in a snap, but the process nearly always starts with a Google search. Go search for “test prep.” Sure, PageRank serves some helpful results, but the tutor or program that’s right for you may be on page 20.

    Knowing that it can take weeks or even months to refine a search and make a decision on all matters education, Noodle Education is today launching what it believes is a better solution: A search and recommendation engine that helps refine the process and suggest educational opportunities based on what’s important to you.

    Like Google, Noodle is attempting to organize an enormous amount of data, aggregating information on a wide range of learning options. As it is today, the search and discovery process for education is fragmenting, as you navigate to one resource for test prep, another for pre-K schooling options, another for guidance counselors, and so on. So, Noodle is attempting to create the first education discovery engine that combines aggregated data with socially-enabled search to help find formal and informal educational opportunities undefined from tutors and schools to study abroad programs and guidance counseling.

    Noodle launched in limited beta in late 2011, but today’s full-scale launch reveals a much more advanced resource, which includes 120,000 education providers across nearly a dozen academic verticals. And even so, the user experience is simple: Searchers enter the term they’re looking for, at which point Noodle asks a few questions to add context to the search. Once answered, the engine serves personalized recommendations for “best-fit” educational opportunities.

    There’s a lot at stake when making education-related decisions, and it takes time. Plus, people want to get advice from those they trust. To address this, Noodle allows users to save, organize, and share their favorite results, and to connect with friends and other students, for example, by engaging their social graph. Students can create their own profiles within Noodle, and share their lists of top schools with friends and family, and add comments as they refine their search, or subscribe to publicly-guided lists, like Princeton Review’s ranking of top universities.

    Today, educational institutions spend inordinate amounts of money on lead generation, which, as one would expect, is largely driven by educational providers. Noodle’s model aims to flip traditional lead generation marketing on its head, so that, instead of institutions reaching out to prospective students or customers, users initiate the dialogue with providers based on Noodle’s recommendations.

    Since its limited beta launch, Noodle has also added what it’s calling a Groupon for tutoring, or a form of discounted group buying. Hiring the best tutors can be an expensive proposition, so Noodle allows students to create small groups of their friends, identify the tutor they want to work with, and receive discounted rates. Tutors get to charge the same price per hour, fill up their slots, while three or four students, for example, get to share the cost.

    Going forward, Noodle wants to become an end-to-end platform for education providers and students, and it hopes to be able to offer providers the opportunity to integrate their tutoring learning management systems, scheduling, etc. based on a rev-share model. The team also sees potential to power education-related search for other verticals, like real estate.

    Noodle is embarking on an ambitious mission, but it seems to already be attracting the funding and leadership that will be able to help see it through. The startup has already raised $3 million in angel funding, and is in the process of closing its Series A round. What’s more, Noodle was founded by John Katzman, who previously founded both The Princeton Review and 2tor, and, in February, Noodle brought on Joe Morgan to serve as its CEO. Morgan is the former president of Blimpie Subs, a founder of Colloquy, and is a former SVP at Kaplan.

    As education becomes increasingly competitive both among startups and among students competing for positions in universities and beyond, it’s become more important than ever for them to be able to identify and discover educational opportunities that are right for them. Education needs better search, and, coupling that with a dynamic recommendation engine makes Noodle an appealing destination.

    For more, check out Noodle at home here. Video intro below:


    Website:noodle.org
    Launch Date:January 1, 2010

    From the founders of The Princeton Review, Noodle helps you find the right school, tutor, and everything educational. Noodle combines aggregated multimedia content with socially-based search to help students and families discover the formal and informal educational opportunities that are best for them.

    LEARN MORE
  • 01 May 2012 6:08 PM | Bill Krisher (Administrator)

    PURPOSE

    The purpose of this Request for Proposals (RFP) is to encourage and support innovative, clinically rich undergraduate upper division teacher preparation pilot program partnerships that will prepare candidates to become effective educators in high-need public schools with high concentrations of under-served and/or under-prepared students, such as those living in poverty, those with special needs, or those who are learning English as a second language. 

    ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

    Institution of Higher Education (IHE) in partnership with at least one eligible Local Education Agency (LEA). Eligible applicants are only those IHEs within New York State with a currently registered, active and accredited program(s) in the Targeted Certification Title(s) for which the proposal is submitted.

    • SWD 7-12 Generalist, with or without SWD subject area extensions and with or without bilingual extensions;
    • Math 7-12 or Science 7-12 Education (Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Earth Science) with or without bilingual extensions;
    • Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).

    (Note: Dual certificate programs are not eligible.)

    The eligibility requirements are solely for purposes of this RFP.

    FUNDING

    Source: RTTT
    Estimated Funds Available: $9.7 million
    Awards will be made subject to availability of funding by the U.S. Department of Education


    IMPORTANT DATES FOR AWARDING GRANTS

    Applications must be received by: June 29, 2012

    Anticipated Preliminary Award Notification:

    August 15, 2012

    Anticipated Project Period:
    11/1/12-8/31/14

     

    APPLICANT WEBINAR AND CORRESPONDENCE

    Applicant Webinar

    The New York State Education Department will host an Applicant Webinar on: May 14, 2012.

    In order to participate in the Webinar Thursday, May 14, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., please email UGTEACHERRFP@mail.nysed.govthe following information to register: 

    1. your name
    2. organization’s name
    3. contact email address
    4. please include "UGCRTPPP Webinar" in the subject line.

    Registration must be submitted by close of business on Thursday, May 10, 2012.  

    All interested applicants should consider attending this webinar because critical project information will be shared, followed by a question and answer period.

    Questions and Correspondence Regarding This RFP

    Questions regarding the request must be submitted by e-mail to UGTEACHERRFP@mail.nysed.gov no later than the close of business May 17, 2012. A Webinar will be held on 5/14/12. Questions regarding this request should be identified as Program or Fiscal.

    A Questions and Answers Summary will be posted to http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/rfp/ no later than June 4, 2012. Individual responses will not be provided.

     

    SED CONTACTS

    Program Matters

    Fiscal Matters

    Elena F. Bruno

    Lynn Caruso

     

    TABLE OF IMPORTANT DATES

    Activity

    Date

    Issue of RFP

    4/30/2012

    Applicant Webinar

    5/14/2012

    Final Receipt of Questions

    5/17/2012

    Official Responses to Questions

    6/4/2012

    Proposal Due Date

    6/29/2012

    Anticipated Preliminary Award Notification

    8/15/2012

    Anticipated Program Start

    11/1/2012

     

    PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

    Applicants are responsible for making sure the application package is complete based on the included Application Checklist. A complete proposal application consists of one package that includes one (1) original plus five (5) copies of each of the following:

    • Proposal Cover Page (Attachment A)
    • Table of Contents
    • Program Narrative –maximum 25 pages
    • Budget Narrative
    • FS-10: Proposed Budget for a Federal or State Project for the first period of November 1, 2012-August 31, 2013 and an FS-10 for project period September 1, 2013 – August 31, 2014.
    • Partnership MOU(s) (Attachment B)
    • Attachment C, Mandatory Requirement Certification
    • Attachment D, Residency School Data
    • Attachment E, Statement of Assurances
    • Attachment F, Yearly Budget Summary
    • Application for Program Registration

    These documents must be submitted as detailed below and received at NYSED no later than 3:00 p.m., June 21, 2012:

    One (1) original and five (5) copies of the proposal package labeled UGCRTPPP Program Proposal - RFP #GT-05.  The original must be clearly identified with the original signature of the CEO or designee; of the Partner LEA superintendent(s) or designee(s); and CEO or designee of other partner(s).  

    One (1) CD containing:

    • a copy of the UGCRTPPP Program Narrative in Microsoft Word (.doc) format or portable document format (.pdf); and
    • all other proposal documents, MOUs, attachments, forms, and the Program Registration Application.

    Proposals must be mailed or delivered to:

    NYS Education Department
    Bureau of Fiscal Management
    Attn: Lynn Caruso, RFP#GT-05
    Contract Administration Unit
    89 Washington Avenue, Room 505W EB
    Albany, NY 12234

    (Facsimile or emailed copies of the proposals are NOT acceptable)

     

    RFP DOCUMENTS


    Original RFP Posting Date: April 30, 2012


<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   Next >  Last >> 
 

 Copyright © 2009-2012 AESNYS   
    PO Box 2311, Scotia, NY 12302-0311            Toll-free phone 1-800-889-9715  NY5K Corp.